This guy seems pretty mad that Pakistan beat the WI partially thanks to Shabbirs chucking action. This raises an interesting question. We all see half naked images of cricketers with cotton balls stuck on them on TV and apparently this is some sort of a “chucking” action test. Does anyone really know what this test measures? Does it have anything to do with biometrics?
It is clear that as long as a certain unnamed Sri Lankan spinner is allowed to ball, there is no reason to accuse anyone else of chucking. Also, what guarantee is there that a bowler would use the same chucking action under these “tests” conduction in Australia? Apparently Shoaib Malik is the only honest person in the world seeing how his action was apparently a THIRTY DEGREE chuck! ICC has revised their chucking rule stating that 15 degrees is not acceptable. I guess this was to be expected considering research showed that under the rules 99% of bowlers in cricket history had illegal action
What would be the best way to take away this controversy? we clearly need technology to step in during the matches to tell us when a bowler is chucking, or at least record enough data during the matches to be able to judge after the matches if a ball was a chuck or not. Something in the order of what the MLB does to judge if a pitch was a ball or not! (sorry can’t find link to what they actually do)